Lesson 21: Levels of Scrutiny
Welcome to Lesson 21 of our series on Exploring Constitutional Law. Today we dive into the concept of Levels of Scrutiny, a crucial aspect of the Equal Protection Clause.
Introduction to Levels of Scrutiny
The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ensures that individuals are treated equally under the law. Courts use different levels of scrutiny to evaluate the constitutionality of laws that classify individuals based on certain characteristics.
Three Levels of Scrutiny
- Rational Basis Review
- Intermediate Scrutiny
- Strict Scrutiny
Rational Basis Review
Rational Basis Review is the most lenient form of judicial review. Here, laws are presumed to be constitutional as long as they have a reasonable relation to a legitimate government interest.
Intermediate Scrutiny
Intermediate Scrutiny is applied to classifications such as gender and legitimacy. It requires that the law furthers an important government interest by means that are substantially related to that interest.
Strict Scrutiny
Strict Scrutiny is the most stringent level of review, used for classifications based on race, national origin, and fundamental rights. The law must serve a compelling government interest and be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.
Visualizing the Levels of Scrutiny
Let's visualize the differences between these levels of scrutiny using a simple bar chart.
Conclusion
Understanding the levels of scrutiny is essential for analyzing equal protection cases. Each level has distinct requirements and burdens of proof, and is used in different types of classifications.
For more insights on the Equal Protection Clause, explore our lesson on the Equal Protection Clause.