Lesson 17: Entrapment

Entrapment is a defense used in criminal law to argue that the defendant should not be held liable for their actions because they were induced or persuaded by law enforcement officials to commit a crime they otherwise would not have committed. It is a nuanced concept and a key part of understanding Defenses to Crimes.

For a deeper dive into criminal law, consider reading Criminal Law: Examples & Explanations.

Understanding Entrapment

Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officials or agents induce a person to commit a crime that they were not predisposed to commit. There are two tests commonly used to determine entrapment:

  • Subjective Test: Focuses on the defendant's state of mind and predisposition to commit the crime.
  • Objective Test: Evaluates the actions of law enforcement to determine if they would have induced any reasonable person to commit the crime.
Note: Entrapment does not apply if the defendant was already willing to commit the crime without law enforcement's persuasion.

Subjective Test

The subjective test of entrapment focuses on the defendant's predisposition to commit the crime. Under this test, the court will consider:

  • Whether the defendant was inclined to commit the crime without government inducement.
  • The nature of the inducement by law enforcement.
  • The defendant's past criminal behavior and readiness to commit similar crimes.

Diagram: Subjective Test of Entrapment

classDiagram class SubjectiveTest { + "Defendant's predisposition" + "Nature of inducement" + "Past criminal behavior" }

Objective Test

The objective test evaluates the actions of law enforcement officers. Under this test, the court considers:

  • Whether the methods used by law enforcement would likely induce a normally law-abiding person to commit the crime.
  • The level of pressure or coercion applied by law enforcement agents.
  • Whether the conduct of law enforcement was outrageous or overbearing.

Diagram: Objective Test of Entrapment

classDiagram class ObjectiveTest { + "Inducement of a law-abiding person" + "Level of pressure" + "Outrageous conduct by law enforcement" }

Case Example

Imagine a scenario where an undercover police officer repeatedly pressures an individual to buy illegal drugs. The individual initially refuses but eventually gives in due to the officer's persistence. In this case, the individual may have a valid defense of entrapment if they were not predisposed to commit the crime.

Diagram: Entrapment Process

sequenceDiagram participant Defendant participant Officer Officer->>Defendant: Induces to commit crime Defendant-->>Officer: Initially refuses Officer->>Defendant: Repeatedly persuades Defendant-->>Officer: Commits crime

Legal Insights

Entrapment is a complex defense that requires a thorough understanding of both the defendant's predisposition and the actions of law enforcement. It is crucial to analyze the specific circumstances of each case to determine if the defense is applicable. For more insights on similar defenses, consider reading about Duress and Necessity.

Looking for more comprehensive resources? Check out Understanding Criminal Law.

Conclusion

Entrapment serves as a critical check on law enforcement practices, preventing them from overstepping boundaries and creating criminals out of otherwise law-abiding citizens. Understanding this defense helps navigate the complexities of criminal law and ensures a fair application of justice.

« Previous
Next »