Lesson 32: Examples of When to Use Spousal Lifetime Access Trust (SLAT) vs. Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRT)

In this lesson, we discuss two advanced estate planning tools: the Spousal Lifetime Access Trust (SLAT) and the Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRT). Both of these instruments can be valuable for ultra high net worth clients, but they serve different purposes and have specific use cases. The decision to use one over the other depends on various factors, including the client’s financial goals, family dynamics, and estate tax considerations.

Spousal Lifetime Access Trust (SLAT)

A Spousal Lifetime Access Trust (SLAT) is an irrevocable trust created by one spouse for the benefit of the other. The grantor spouse transfers assets into the trust, and the beneficiary spouse can access income and principal from the trust. This arrangement allows for the reduction of the grantor's taxable estate while still providing financial support to the beneficiary spouse.

When to Use SLAT

  • Estate Tax Reduction: SLATs are effective for reducing the taxable estate of the grantor spouse because the transferred assets are removed from their estate.
  • Access to Funds: The beneficiary spouse retains access to the trust assets, providing financial security.
  • Asset Protection: The assets in the SLAT can be protected from creditors of the grantor spouse.

Example: Establishing a SLAT with $10M in Investments

John transfers $10M in diversified investments into a SLAT for the benefit of his spouse, Jane. The trust provides Jane with access to income and principal for her needs, while the $10M is removed from John's taxable estate.

Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRT)

A Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRT) is an irrevocable trust designed to allow the transfer of a personal residence to beneficiaries at a reduced gift tax value. The grantor retains the right to live in the home for a specified term, after which the property passes to the beneficiaries.

When to Use QPRT

  • Gift Tax Savings: A QPRT allows the transfer of a residence at a discounted value for gift tax purposes.
  • Continued Use of Home: The grantor can continue to live in the home for a predetermined period.
  • Estate Tax Reduction: After the trust term ends, the residence passes to the beneficiaries, removing it from the grantor's estate.

Example: Transferring a $5M Primary Residence to a QPRT

Mary transfers her $5M primary residence into a QPRT, retaining the right to live there for 10 years. After the term, the residence passes to her children, reducing her taxable estate.

Comparison of SLAT and QPRT

Choosing between a SLAT and a QPRT depends on the specific circumstances and goals of the client. Below is a comparative analysis to help in decision-making.

graph TD A["Client's Goals"] --> B["Reduce Taxable Estate"] A --> C["Provide Financial Security to Spouse"] A --> D["Transfer Residence to Beneficiaries"] B --> E["SLAT"] C --> E["SLAT"] D --> F["QPRT"]

Lesson 32: Examples of When to Use Spousal Lifetime Access Trust (SLAT) vs. Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRT)

Comparison of SLAT and QPRT

Choosing between a SLAT and a QPRT depends on the specific circumstances and goals of the client. Below is a comparative analysis to help in decision-making.

graph TD A["Client's Goals"] --> B["Reduce Taxable Estate"] A --> C["Provide Financial Security to Spouse"] A --> D["Transfer Residence to Beneficiaries"] B --> E["SLAT"] C --> E["SLAT"] D --> F["QPRT"]

When to Use SLAT vs. QPRT

To further clarify when to use each trust type, let's explore some practical examples:

Example 1: High Net Worth Individual with Significant Investment Portfolio

Emily has a $20M investment portfolio and wants to reduce her taxable estate while ensuring her spouse can access funds if needed. In this case, a SLAT would be ideal. She transfers $10M into a SLAT for her spouse's benefit, providing estate tax reduction and financial security. For more in-depth information, consider reading Estate Planning Strategies.

Example 2: High Net Worth Individual with Valuable Primary Residence

Michael owns a $10M primary residence and wants to pass it to his children at a reduced gift tax value. He decides to use a QPRT, transferring the house into the trust and retaining the right to live there for 15 years. This strategy reduces his taxable estate while allowing continued use of his home. For more in-depth information, consider reading Advanced Estate Planning Techniques.

Tradeoffs and Considerations

Each trust type comes with its own set of tradeoffs and considerations:

  • Irrevocability: Both SLATs and QPRTs are irrevocable. Ensure clients are fully committed before proceeding.
  • Control and Flexibility: SLATs allow the beneficiary spouse to access funds, whereas QPRTs provide continued residence use but no access to trust assets.
  • Risk of Grantor’s Death: For QPRTs, if the grantor dies before the end term, the residence is included in their estate, which may negate tax benefits.
  • Asset Type: SLATs are suitable for liquid assets and investments, while QPRTs are specifically designed for personal residences.

Conclusion

Both Spousal Lifetime Access Trusts (SLATs) and Qualified Personal Residence Trusts (QPRTs) offer powerful estate planning benefits for ultra high net worth clients. The choice between them should be guided by the client's specific goals, asset types, and risk tolerance.

For a more comprehensive understanding of estate planning tools, consider reading our other lessons:

Next »