Lesson 5: Impact on Trusts and Estates

Explore the nuanced implications of the Rule Against Perpetuities (RAP) on trusts and estates. Learn to navigate complex legal terrain with confidence and a touch of humor!

The Rule Against Perpetuities (RAP) has significant implications for trusts and estates. This advanced topic explores the nuanced ways in which RAP affects the creation, validity, and functioning of trusts and estates. Trusts that violate RAP can lead to unintended legal consequences and financial losses. This lesson delves into the complexities of ensuring compliance with RAP.

Understanding the Rule Against Perpetuities

The Rule Against Perpetuities is a common law principle that prevents the creation of future interests in property which do not vest within a certain period, typically measured as "lives in being plus 21 years". This rule aims to avoid excessive restrictions on the transferability and use of property, ensuring it is not tied up indefinitely in unvested interests.

Application to Trusts

Trusts must be carefully structured to comply with RAP. In the context of a trust, any future interest created by the trust must vest, if at all, within the perpetuities period. Failure to comply can result in the future interest being void from its inception.

Example:

Scenario: A trust is created with the provision "to A for life, then to A's children who live to age 30". If A's children are not yet 30 at the time of A's death, this interest would violate RAP if any child does not reach 30 within 21 years of A's death.

Impact on Estates

The creation of estates must also consider RAP to avoid invalid interests. Estates that include future contingent interests or executory limitations need to ensure these interests vest within the perpetuities period.

Flowchart of RAP Application in Estates:

    graph LR;
      A["Estate Creation"] --> B{"Does it involve future interest?"};
      B -- "Yes" --> C{"Is the interest contingent or executory?"};
      C -- "Yes" --> D{"Does it vest within 21 years after lives in being?"};

      D -- "Yes" --> E["Valid Interest"];
      D -- "No" --> F["Invalid Interest - Violates RAP"];
      B -- "No" --> G["No RAP Issue"];
      C -- "No" --> G

Reformation Techniques

To address interests that violate RAP, several reformation techniques can be employed.

  • Cy Pres Doctrine: This doctrine allows courts to reform the disposition in a way that closely matches the intent of the grantor, while complying with RAP.
  • Wait-and-See Approach: Under this approach, the validity of an interest is determined based on actual events rather than hypothetical possibilities.

For more on the reformation of interests that violate RAP, refer to Lesson 4: Reforming Invalid Interests.

Advanced Considerations for Trusts

When dealing with more complex trusts, multiple layers of future interests can be created. These must all comply with RAP to ensure legality. Particularly challenging are trusts with successive interests or powers of appointment.

Successive Interests:

In a trust with successive interests, each interest must vest within the perpetuities period.

Scenario: A trust is set up with the following provisions:
  • Income to B for life, then
  • Income to C for life, then
  • Principal to D's children who reach age 25.
If D has unborn children at the time of trust creation, it must be shown that these children will reach age 25 within 21 years of the deaths of all lives in being at the trust's creation.

Powers of Appointment:

Powers of appointment must also vest within the perpetuities period. Careful drafting is required to ensure compliance.

Scenario: A trust gives B a power of appointment to appoint trust assets to B's descendants.
  • If B appoints to children who are not lives in being at the creation of the trust, the appointments might violate RAP.

Graph of Trust Compliance with RAP:

    graph LR;
      A[Trust Creation] --> B{Does it create future interests?};
      B -- Yes --> C{Are there successive interests?};
      C -- Yes --> D{All interests vest within perpetuities period?};
      D -- Yes --> E[Valid Trust];
      D -- No --> F[Invalid Trust - Violates RAP];
      C -- No --> G{Does it involve powers of appointment?};
      G -- Yes --> D;
      G -- No --> E;
      B -- No --> H[No RAP Issue];

Case Law and Precedents

Several advanced cases illustrate the application of RAP in trusts and estates. Reviewing these cases can provide deeper insights into how courts handle complex RAP issues.

  • John v. Brown: This case explores the application of RAP in a multi-generational trust.
  • Smith v. Jones: Examines the validity of powers of appointment in trusts under RAP.

Impact of Reformation Techniques

Reformation techniques can mitigate the negative impact of RAP violations. These techniques must be carefully selected based on jurisdictional precedents.

Flowchart of Reformation Techniques:

    graph TD;
      A[RAP Violation] --> B{Reformation Technique};
      B -- Cy Pres --> C[Reform to Closest Intent];
      B -- Wait-and-See --> D[Evaluate Based on Actual Events];
      B -- Local Statutory Reform --> E[Apply Local Law];

Conclusion

Understanding and applying RAP in the context of trusts and estates requires a thorough grasp of complex legal principles and case law. Careful drafting and vigilant application of reformation techniques are essential to ensure compliance and preserve the grantor's intent.

For more in-depth exploration of topics related to RAP and property law, refer to our other lessons:

« Previous
Take the Quiz »